The proposed legislation on “protected conversations” is in danger of missing the point

Lucy Kellaway (Lucy Kellaway) and others have recently commented on the proposed legislation in respect of its pros and cons from a practical point of view. Fair enough, but there is an opportunity now to start to reflect in legislation the reality of the workplace in the 21st. Century, that is: we are all micro-businesses selling our services to organisations, which are themselves merely coalitions of these micro-businesses for increasingly brief periods, and we are doing so in return for cash and “soft” benefits. The “conversation” required, whether protected or not, is the reframing of the “deal” between ourselves and organisations. What do we need from the organisation? What does it need from us? On what terms? It’s that simple except that it requires an Adult-Adult transaction – not a Parent-Child transaction as in days of yore. If this reality were reflected in legislation, then Lucy Kellaway’s view that we all need to be told to pull up our socks from time to time can and should still happen but more in the nature of a breach of an SLA rather than a “telling off”.

Ciaran Fenton
Fenton & Co LLP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s